Loading...
Short answer: solid, without being the number it sounds like. Here's the whole picture, not the headline number.
That's what a $100,000 Austin salary is actually worth, after federal tax, Social Security and Medicare, and local prices that run 1.9% below the national average. Texas charges no state income tax, which helps. It doesn't rescue you.
Austin prices sit almost exactly at the national average, which makes this one of the rare cities where a salary means roughly what you think it means.
So let's do the whole thing.
Start with the headline number and subtract reality. Single filer, standard deduction, 2026 brackets:
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Gross salary | $100,000 |
| Federal income tax | −$13,170 |
| Social Security and Medicare | −$7,650 |
| Texas state income tax | $0 |
| Take-home pay | $79,180 |
| Adjusted for Austin prices (1.9% below average) | $80,714 |
That last row is the one that matters and it's the one nobody shows you. Your $79,180 spends like $80,714 would somewhere average. The federal government scores every metro against a national average of 100, and Austin scores 98.1. Austin hands you back roughly $1,500 a year of purchasing power you would not have somewhere average.
The missing income tax more than covers the price difference. That's rarer than it sounds.
Texas charges no personal income tax, worth about $4,200 a year at this income against a typical taxing state.
And here it genuinely wins. What you don't hand over in tax outweighs what the local price level costs you, which is the combination people assume they're getting whenever they move somewhere tax-free and usually are not.
Everything above assumes a single filer, which is the common case for "is this salary any good" and the wrong one for plenty of readers. If $100,000 is a household's income and you file jointly, the federal picture changes a lot: the standard deduction doubles and every bracket widens, so federal tax falls from $13,170 to $7,640. That is $5,530 a year back in your pocket.
| Line | Single | Filing jointly |
|---|---|---|
| Federal income tax | $13,170 | $7,640 |
| Social Security and Medicare | $7,650 | $7,650 |
| Take-home pay, at least | $79,180 | $84,710 |
| Same buying power as | $80,714 | $86,351 |
One caveat on that joint column, and it runs in your favour. We hold Texas tax at the single-filer figure, because state schedules for joint filers vary and we would rather understate the benefit than guess at it. Most states widen their brackets for joint filers too, so your real joint take-home is likely a little higher than the number above, not lower.
Austin being 2% below average is a blended figure, and blending is exactly what you don't want here. Groceries and everyday goods run 6% below average. Housing runs 20% above it.
So the premium is rent. Your weekly shop will feel much like it did wherever you came from. Your rent won't, and it's the line that moves.
A one-bedroom at Austin's fair market rent runs $1,562 a month, $1,852 for a two-bedroom. Against take-home of $6,598 a month, the one-bedroom eats 24% of it.
That's comfortably inside the 30% rule with room to spare, which leaves $5,036 a month for everything else. This is the range where saving happens without thinking about it.
Austin peaked in 2016 at 102.6 and has been coming back down since. It now sits 4.5 index points below that high.
That matters more than it sounds. Anyone quoting you a Austin cost-of-living figure from a few years ago is quoting the peak, and the peak is not where things are.
Flip it around. To match what $100,000 buys at the national average, Austin only needs to pay you $98,100.
So the same salary stretches further here than the number suggests. Worth knowing if you ever do end up negotiating.
| Metro | Price level100 = US avg | State tax | Real value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Austin, TX | 98.1 | None | $80,714 |
| Kansas City, MO | 92.5 | 3.8% | $81,532 |
| Raleigh, NC | 98.2 | 3.5% | $77,086 |
| Dallas, TX | 103.1 | None | $76,799 |
Your salary, your two cities, real federal price data. Takes about fifteen seconds.
Compare my citiesIt's solid. $100,000 converts to $80,714 of real spending power in Austin, which puts you in decent shape without putting you in a penthouse.
It'll rent you somewhere decent without drama and it won't make you rich. Both of those are true at once.
After tax you keep about $79,180, which is roughly $6,598 a month. Against Austin's price level of 98.1, where 100 is the national average, that spends like $80,714 would somewhere average. Comfortable for one person, workable for two, tighter than the headline number suggests once there are children involved.
About $98,100, matching Austin's price level of 98.1 against the national average of 100. If you're moving from a specific city rather than the national average, run both through the calculator, because the answer moves a lot.
Yes, at this income. At $100,000 the missing state income tax is worth roughly $4,200 a year compared with a typical taxing state, while Austin's price level costs about $1,500 against the national average.
Price levels are Regional Price Parities from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, the federal government's official measure of geographic price differences. Tax figures are 2026 federal brackets and Texas state rates. We show the data vintage on every page so you know exactly how current the figures are.